How would you report to the Engineer Superintendent, by e-mail, the inspections, findings and repair suggestions for a significant rise in fuel consumption after dry-docking?
Short answer
flowchart TD
A["Higher fuel consumption after dry-docking"] --> B["Baseline: shaft power, RPM, speed and SFOC against pre-dock figures, corrected"]
B --> C{"Where is the cause?"}
C -->|External| D["Hull coating roughness, propeller condition and refit, trim"]
C -->|Internal| E["Indicator cards, injectors, fuel-pump timing and VIT, turbochargers, air coolers"]
D --> F["In-water hull cleaning, propeller polishing, yard guarantee claim"]
E --> G["Overhaul injectors, correct timing, water-wash turbochargers, clean coolers"]
- A dry-docking should reduce hull resistance, so a rise points to a dock defect or a coincident engine problem.
- First correct the baseline for draught, trim, weather, current and the fuel’s calorific value. A lower-CV bunker alone can raise consumption.
- External causes: a rough or poorly applied coating, early re-fouling, or a rough, damaged or wrongly refitted propeller.
- Internal causes: low or uneven Pmax and Pcomp, worn injectors, wrong timing or VIT, fouled turbochargers or air coolers.
- Also check the fuel-flow-meter calibration and the fuel treatment.
- Engine faults are corrected on board. Hull and propeller issues are raised with the yard under the docking guarantee.
Full answer
The full answer explains each point step by step, with the regulations and figures behind it and the discussion from other candidates. It is in the MEO Class I section of the Marine One forum, open to members enrolled for the MEO Class I exam.